VLSI & AI Chip Design · Practical career preparation

VLSI Design Verification with SystemVerilog & UVM

Build verification environments that find bugs—and explain how you know they work. VLSI & AI Chip Design · Practical career preparation

13 core modules Preparation matched to your diagnostic One independently assessed capstone
RoboEdify track record
10,000+
alumni transformed
1,000+
hiring partners
4.8/5
average class rating
87%
placed in 6 months
10+
years of training
Where our AI alumni work
MicrosoftAmazonSalesforceServiceNowDeloitteInfosysAccentureTCSWiproCapgeminiCognizantHCL MicrosoftAmazonSalesforceServiceNowDeloitteInfosysAccentureTCSWiproCapgeminiCognizantHCL
Direct answer

What does a design verification engineer do?

A design verification engineer checks whether a digital hardware design behaves as its specification requires. The work includes planning tests, generating stimulus, checking results, finding corner-case failures and documenting what has—and has not—been verified.

In this course, you follow that workflow from a small self-checking testbench to a reusable UVM environment. You learn to distinguish a design defect from a testbench error and support your conclusions with reproducible evidence.

Four stages of the learning journey
01Understand the specification.

Define expected behavior, boundaries and error cases before writing tests.

02Build independent checks.

Use reference models, monitors and assertions to detect incorrect behavior.

03Create reusable environments.

Organize stimulus, agents, scoreboards and register models with UVM.

04Review verification results.

Run regressions, investigate coverage gaps and defend your closure report.

Why this course focuses on debugging

A passing simulation is only useful when the checks can catch failures.

You will deliberately encounter broken handshakes, stale register predictions, reset interruptions and misleading coverage results. Each exercise asks you to reproduce the problem, explain its cause and show that your fix addresses it.

That practice carries through to the final assessment: you must explain your environment and diagnose an unfamiliar failure individually.

Learning format

Learn through classes, labs and individual feedback.

The program combines live mentor-led classes, guided labs, project work and support sessions. Your diagnostic determines the preparation you need before entering the common core.

Choose on-campus, live online or a working-professional format. An advisor can explain the current class format and learning support before enrollment.

On-campusLive onlineWorking-professional format
Who should join

One verification core. Preparation matched to your starting point.

Graduates and learners entering VLSIBuild the digital-logic, RTL-reading and computing foundations you need before moving into verification. No prior UVM knowledge is required. Readiness is assessed through practical tasks, not your degree title alone.
Working engineersUse your existing skills to shorten preparation where appropriate. A diagnostic identifies any gaps in RTL, digital timing, scripting or verification reasoning before you join the common core.
:
  • •Read a small sequential RTL block and explain its reset behavior.
  • •Interpret a waveform and reason about clock-cycle events.
  • •Work with binary arithmetic and basic digital logic.
  • •Run a simulation or command-line task and inspect its output.
Learning outcomes

Leave with skills you can demonstrate.

Plan verification from a specificationConnect features and risks to tests, checkers, assertions and coverage requirements.
Build SystemVerilog and UVM environmentsDevelop transaction-based testbenches, agents, sequences, monitors and scoreboards.
Check protocol and register behaviorVerify APB and AXI4-Lite transfers, stalls, errors, reset and register side effects.
Investigate difficult failuresUse waveforms, logs and reduced test cases to separate design, testbench and configuration errors.
Evaluate coverage meaningfullyIdentify missing scenarios and explain exclusions without treating coverage percentages as proof of correctness.
Defend a complete projectPresent your verification plan, regression results, bug reports and remaining limitations in an individual review.
Preparation track — based on your diagnostic

What you practise before the core.

Computing and scriptingLinux, Git, Python and simulation logs
Digital designCombinational/sequential logic, FSMs, timing and reset
RTL foundationsVerilog, synthesizable behavior, simulation and debugging
Verification foundationsBoundary tests, independent expected results and failure reproduction

Preparation is assigned from your diagnostic. Learners who need more foundational support receive a separate learning plan before entering the core.

Course curriculum

Thirteen modules. From verification planning to an independent capstone.

Each module combines technical concepts with a practical task, a failure investigation and a reviewed submission. Preparation sits before the common core.

01

Verification workflow and planning

Foundations

Turn a hardware specification into a plan that defines what must be checked.

+
Topics
•Design and verification roles in an ASIC workflow
•Feature, risk and test traceability
•Normal, boundary, error and reset scenarios
•Checkers, assertions, coverage and exit criteria
Hands-on lab
Derive a verification plan for a FIFO/peripheral specification with ambiguous simultaneous-operation behavior.
Failure scenario you solve
A random test generates traffic, but no checker verifies that the output data is correct.
You build
Verification planExpected-result tableFeature-to-check mapping
Assessed outcome: Explain how each selected feature is checked and identify an unverified behavior.
02

SystemVerilog language and simulation

SystemVerilog

Use the language and simulation model correctly before building larger environments.

+
Topics
•Two-state/four-state types, arrays, queues, structs and enums
•Signedness, widths, casts, functions and tasks
•Packages, interfaces, modports and clocking blocks
•Event scheduling, race conditions, reset and reproducibility
Hands-on lab
Build a self-checking procedural environment and repair data-width and sampling errors.
Failure scenario you solve
A test passes or fails depending on when the testbench samples the clock edge.
You build
Self-checking testbenchScheduling examplesReproducible tests
Assessed outcome: Predict a clock-edge interaction and distinguish a sampling issue from an RTL defect.
03

OOP, concurrency and transaction environments

SystemVerilog

Separate transactions, stimulus, monitoring and checking into a clear architecture.

+
Topics
•Classes, handles, inheritance and polymorphism
•Object copying and transaction ownership
•Mailboxes, semaphores, events and process lifetime
•Generator, driver, monitor and scoreboard responsibilities
Hands-on lab
Build a class-based environment and debug a reused-transaction-handle error.
Failure scenario you solve
Every stored transaction appears to change when the driver reuses one mutable object.
You build
Transaction classesEnvironment diagramIndependent scoreboard
Assessed outcome: Explain object ownership and preserve expected results across concurrent activity.
04

SystemVerilog Assertions

Assertions

Express temporal requirements and check that your properties activate as intended.

+
Topics
•Immediate and concurrent assertions
•Sequences, implications and sampled-value functions
•Reset conditions, bind and failure messages
•Vacuity, coverage properties and environmental assumptions
Hands-on lab
Check data stability during a stall, FIFO bounds and reset behavior; investigate a vacuously passing property.
Failure scenario you solve
An assertion is always green because its triggering condition never occurs.
You build
Assertion packageIntentional pass/fail casesRequirement mapping
Assessed outcome: Make a property detect the intended defect and explain its activation conditions.
05

Functional coverage and constrained randomization

Coverage

Generate legal stimulus and use coverage to find meaningful gaps.

+
Topics
•Constraints, distributions and randomization failures
•Covergroups, coverpoints, bins and crosses
•Sampling, reachable scenarios and exclusions
•Code coverage versus functional coverage and correctness
Hands-on lab
Bias FIFO traffic toward full/empty boundaries and investigate an overconstrained generator.
Failure scenario you solve
The coverage dashboard looks complete even though data checks are failing.
You build
Coverage modelConstrained stimulusCoverage-gap investigation
Assessed outcome: Distinguish an observed scenario from verified correct behavior.
06

UVM foundations and complete agent

UVM

Build a working UVM environment with a traceable transaction flow.

+
Topics
•Objects, components, hierarchy, phases and objections
•Factory creation, configuration and virtual interfaces
•Sequences, sequencers and driver handshakes
•Active/passive agents, monitors, analysis connections and scoreboards
Hands-on lab
Migrate your class-based environment to UVM and run smoke, boundary and reset tests.
Failure scenario you solve
The simulation runs, but a broken analysis connection means the scoreboard receives no transactions.
You build
UVM agentWorking environmentSmoke and boundary tests
Assessed outcome: Trace a transaction from sequence to pins to checker and locate a broken connection.
07

UVM reuse and coordinated stimulus

UVM

Reuse validated components while coordinating several sources of activity.

+
Topics
•Factory overrides and configuration objects
•Sequence layering and response handling
•Virtual sequences and cross-agent coordination
•Reset interruption and environment reuse
Hands-on lab
Reuse an agent in active/passive modes and coordinate bus writes with FIFO traffic.
Failure scenario you solve
A reset interrupts traffic and leaves a sequence waiting for a response that can no longer arrive.
You build
Configurable environmentCoordinated testsReset-recovery scenarios
Assessed outcome: Demonstrate reuse and handle interrupted transactions according to the reset contract.
08

APB and AXI4-Lite verification

Protocols

Verify defined bus behavior through realistic stalls, errors and timing variations.

+
Topics
•APB setup/access phases, wait states and errors
•AXI4-Lite independent channels and VALID/READY transfers
•Write strobes, responses, ordering and supported transaction limits
•Reset interruptions and protocol-aware monitoring
Hands-on lab
Build an APB agent and complete supplied AXI4-Lite scaffolding; test address-before-data and data-before-address writes.
Failure scenario you solve
A peripheral accepts a write only when address and data arrive in the same cycle.
You build
Protocol test matrixBus checkersReconstructed transactions
Assessed outcome: Detect handshake and response defects within the documented protocol and DUT scope.
09

UVM Register Abstraction Layer

Register models

Connect register-level tests to bus activity while handling prediction and side effects.

+
Topics
•Registers, fields, maps and access policies
•Adapters, sequencer binding and prediction
•Frontdoor/backdoor access and mirrored values
•Volatile fields, write-one-to-clear behavior and reset values
Hands-on lab
Integrate a register model and test partial writes, status changes and stale predictions.
Failure scenario you solve
The register mirror has the expected value even though the DUT never accepted the write.
You build
Register modelPrediction strategySide-effect tests
Assessed outcome: Explain how independent observations establish actual DUT register behavior.
10

Regression automation and closure

Debug and closure

Make failures reproducible and keep result reporting trustworthy.

+
Topics
•Test lists, seeds, timeouts and run manifests
•Compile, elaboration and runtime failure classification
•Failure reduction, reruns and bug triage
•Compatible coverage merging and closure reports
Hands-on lab
Build a regression runner that records failures and lets another learner reproduce a selected case.
Failure scenario you solve
A crashed or missing test is accidentally included in the pass count.
You build
Regression scriptsResult summaryRerun instructionsClosure draft
Assessed outcome: Reproduce a failure from a clean checkout and report incomplete runs correctly.
11

Advanced verification awareness and AI-assisted work

Orientation

Understand where simulation fits and evaluate AI-generated suggestions critically.

+
Topics
•CDC/RDC, formal verification and their scope
•Low-power intent and gate-level/X-propagation awareness
•AI-assisted test suggestions and log summaries
•Independent validation of generated tests and assertions
Hands-on lab
Review a flawed generated assertion against a frozen requirement and justify accepting or rejecting it.
Failure scenario you solve
A suggested test looks plausible but checks a weaker condition than the specification requires.
You build
Method-selection noteReviewed AI suggestionsIndependent evidence
Assessed outcome: Explain the limits of the method used and identify behavior that remains unverified.
12

Independent verification capstone

Capstone

Bring planning, UVM, protocols, registers and closure into one assessed project.

+
Topics
•Frozen IP specification and verification plan
•Independent scoreboard and assertion integration
•Directed/random scenarios, reset and coverage analysis
•Regression, bug investigation and technical defense
Hands-on lab
Verify a supplied AXI4-Lite-controlled FIFO subsystem with status registers, a threshold interrupt and concurrent ready/valid traffic.
Failure scenario you solve
The subsystem works in simple tests but loses or misreports data when stalls and reset overlap.
You build
UVM repositoryVerification planBug reportsCoverage and closure report
Assessed outcome: Detect mandatory reachable defects, reproduce results and defend your own implementation decisions.
13

Technical interviews and portfolio handoff

Career preparation

Explain your work clearly and demonstrate independent debugging.

+
Topics
•Digital logic, RTL and protocol waveform questions
•SystemVerilog scheduling and UVM architecture
•Assertion and coverage reasoning
•Repository walkthroughs and evidence-based resume statements
Hands-on lab
Complete a live debugging exercise and present your capstone to an assessor.
Failure scenario you solve
A learner can repeat UVM terminology but cannot explain the scoreboard in their own project.
You build
Reviewed project summaryTechnical READMEIndividual feedback
Assessed outcome: Explain your contribution and diagnose an unfamiliar failure without relying on a prepared demo.

Scope note: APB and AXI4-Lite receive practical implementation and verification coverage. Advanced bus protocols, full-chip verification, formal, CDC/RDC and low-power flows are introductions or later specializations where stated.

Tools and methods

Work with the tools behind a reproducible verification environment.

SystemVerilogTransactions, interfaces, stimulus and checking
UVMReusable components, agents, sequences and environments
SystemVerilog AssertionsTemporal requirements and protocol checks
Functional coverageScenario tracking and gap investigation
APB and AXI4-LitePractical protocol verification
UVM RALRegister tests and prediction
Linux, Git and PythonBuilds, source control, regression and log processing
Simulator and waveform toolsRun tests, inspect activity and reproduce failures

The simulator, software versions and access arrangements will be specified for the cohort. The core is simulation-based; an FPGA board is not required.

Projects and portfolio

Build your skills through three guided projects and one independent capstone.

These projects develop across the modules. They are integrated into the core curriculum.

Guided project 1

Self-checking FIFO environment

Build a transaction-based SystemVerilog environment with an independent reference model. Test full/empty boundaries, stalls and reset, then investigate deliberately seeded defects.

Portfolio evidence
TestbenchReference modelBoundary testsBug investigation
Guided project 2

Reusable UVM agent

Turn the environment into configurable UVM components. Demonstrate active/passive operation, transaction flow, coordinated stimulus and clean reset handling.

Portfolio evidence
Agent architectureSequencesMonitor/scoreboard connectionsReuse demonstration
Guided project 3

Bus and register verification

Verify APB behavior, complete AXI4-Lite agent scaffolding and integrate a small register model. Check partial writes, errors, volatile status and prediction behavior.

Portfolio evidence
Protocol scenariosRegister modelAssertionsCoverage investigation
Capstone

AXI4-Lite-controlled FIFO subsystem

Verify a supplied digital IP block with control/status registers, FIFO behavior, threshold interrupts and an independent ready/valid data interface.

Your work covers the complete verification cycle: specification review, planning, environment integration, independent checks, stress scenarios, regression and closure.

What you submit
  • •Verification plan and environment diagram.
  • •UVM source, independent scoreboard and assertions.
  • •Register model, protocol scenarios and functional coverage.
  • •Reproducible regression scripts and bug reports.
  • •Closure report explaining results, exclusions and remaining limitations.
  • •Individual project walkthrough and live debugging assessment.
What the assessor checks: Correct behavior is checked independently; mandatory reachable scenarios and seeded defects are addressed; results are reproducible; and you can explain your own decisions. A coverage percentage alone does not establish completion.
Assessment and completion

Demonstrate what you can do.

Assessment combines practical submissions, checkpoints, an independent capstone and a live technical defense.

RoboEdify · Certificate of Completion
VLSI Design Verification with SystemVerilog & UVM
Presented to
Learner name
Awarded for completing the course's practical assessments and independently defending a SystemVerilog/UVM verification project.
Manikanta Kona
Founder · RoboEdify
ROBO
EDIFY
CERT
30%
Module labs
20%
Practical checkpoints
35%
Capstone
15%
Individual debugging and defense
The proposed completion standard is 70% overall, at least 60% separately in the capstone and individual defense, and completion of all mandatory practical requirements. Feedback identifies specific gaps for remediation and reassessment.
This is a proposed RoboEdify course credential. No external accreditation, EDA-vendor certification or partner endorsement is claimed.
Career preparation

Prepare for entry-level verification work with a project you can explain.

Design Verification Trainee / Junior EngineerPractise building tests, investigating failures and maintaining a structured verification environment.
IP Verification Trainee / Junior EngineerDevelop experience with interface behavior, register models, independent checking and verification reporting.
ASIC Verification Intern / Graduate TraineeBuild the technical foundations and practical evidence relevant to supervised verification work, subject to each employer's eligibility requirements.
:
  • •A reviewed technical project summary and repository README.
  • •Resume statements grounded in your actual contribution.
  • •Waveform, SystemVerilog, UVM and debugging interview practice.
  • •An individual capstone walkthrough with technical feedback.

The course prepares you for applications and interviews. It does not guarantee an interview, offer, employer or salary.

Career support

Build your portfolio. Prepare your profile. Practise your interviews.

Career support includes portfolio and profile preparation, interview practice, and role-fit introductions where available. The shared hiring-partner network includes Infosys, TCS, Deloitte, Accenture, Cognizant, NTT Data and Capgemini.
01 / PORTFOLIO

Evidence from your own work.

For this course, your portfolio centres on the verification environment, bug investigations, regression evidence and technical defense you complete.

02 / PROFILE

Profile and resume preparation.

A reviewed technical project summary, a readable repository and resume statements grounded in your contribution.

03 / INTERVIEWS

Interview practice and introductions.

Technical interview practice, with role-fit introductions where available.

RoboEdify does not guarantee an interview, offer, salary, employer, location or timeline.

Institute leadership

Meet the team behind RoboEdify.

MK
Manikanta Kona
Founder, RoboEdify · Enterprise AI Architect
Enterprise AI · Agentic Systems · LLM Platforms · Robotics & Edge AI
15 yrs
ENTERPRISE AI
2,400+
LEARNERS
4.9 /5
RATING

Manikanta brings 15 years of enterprise platform architecture experience from AT&T, Salesforce, Cox Communications and Broadcom. His background includes enterprise platform and AI rollouts for Fortune-500 banks, telcos and insurers, and production agentic-AI deployments for governed case handling.

Education: M.S. in Engineering, Purdue University.

RK
Ravi Krishna
Chief Technologist, RoboEdify · Implementation & Delivery Lead
Enterprise automation · Deployment · Evaluation evidence · Delivery governance
10 yrs
IMPLEMENTATION & DELIVERY
1,800+
LEARNERS
4.8 /5
RATING

Ravi leads RoboEdify's implementation and delivery practice. His background spans enterprise automation programs, deployment, evaluation evidence and delivery governance.

Industry voices from RoboEdify’s AI programs

What employers say about RoboEdify’s AI and robotics graduates.

The following testimonials retain their original program context. They describe AI, robotics and enterprise-program experience, rather than outcomes from this VLSI course.

Microsoft logo

RoboEdify grads ramp 40% faster on applied AI projects than typical hires. Best AI engineering pipeline in India.

Aakash Mehta

Aakash Mehta, Partner Programme Lead, Microsoft

Deloitte logo

We've onboarded 80+ RoboEdify alumni in 18 months. Lowest ramp time we've seen for ML plus AI agent practices.

Anita Sharma

Anita Sharma, Senior Manager, Deloitte

Mphasis logo

The programme is comprehensive — predictive ML, LLM systems, plus agentic and robotics work. Grads come pre-trained for enterprise.

Rahul Bhatt

Rahul Bhatt, Solutions Lead, Mphasis

TCS logo

Their agent + robotics track produces engineers who ship production-grade perception and control code on day one. Genuinely rare.

Deepak Pillai

Deepak Pillai, Senior Architect, TCS

Accenture logo

What sets RoboEdify apart is the simulation-to-hardware layer baked into the AI track. Our clients ask for exactly this profile.

Suresh Menon

Suresh Menon, Practice Lead, Accenture

Infosys logo

Their fundamentals prep is rigorous, and the capstone with a real deployed system and safety case is what closes interviews for us.

Vikram Iyer

Vikram Iyer, Director, Infosys

Wipro logo

RoboEdify's AI grads get models into production twice as fast in the first 90 days. Our internal metrics back this up clearly.

Lakshmi Nair

Lakshmi Nair, VP Engineering, Wipro

Cognizant logo

Best AI + robotics pipeline we've sourced from in India. Their projects are production work, not toy code.

Karthik Subramanian

Karthik Subramanian, Engineering Director, Cognizant

Capgemini logo

Strong ML and edge-deployment foundation. Their grads need almost zero ramp time on enterprise engagements with us.

Arun Joshi

Arun Joshi, Practice Director, Capgemini

IBM logo

We've placed 40+ RoboEdify alumni across our AI and automation teams. Strong fundamentals, sharp on the agent stack.

Sanjay Verma

Sanjay Verma, Talent Director, IBM

LTIMindtree logo

ITOM + Predictive Intelligence is exactly the talent gap we've been struggling to close. RoboEdify is filling it for us reliably.

Anjali Desai

Anjali Desai, Practice Head, LTIMindtree

Tech Mahindra logo

Their AI track delivers engineers who navigate data, models and integrations on customer engagements unsupervised.

Ramesh Iyer

Ramesh Iyer, Senior Manager, Tech Mahindra

Cyient logo

Hired 25+ RoboEdify graduates for our AI practice. Strong coding, strong ML depth, sharp on the agent layer.

Geetha Pillai

Geetha Pillai, Talent Acquisition Lead, Cyient

Microsoft logo

RoboEdify grads who blend robotics with Azure OpenAI land production-ready on day one. Rare combination, well-trained.

Priya Reddy

Priya Reddy, Talent Lead, Microsoft

AI alumni across RoboEdify

Meet alumni featured in our AI programs.

SB
Spandana Bala
ML Engineer
Hyderabad · India
Now at · Infosys
NV
Naveen Vedala
AI Agent Engineer
Hyderabad · India
Now at · TCS
TA
Tejashwini Addla
Simulation Engineer
Hyderabad · India
Now at · Deloitte
TD
Tharunesh Dillikar
Robotics Software Engineer
Seattle · United States
Now at · Accenture
MM
Mujahed Mohammed
Edge AI Engineer
Hyderabad · India
Now at · Accenture
BK
Bhargav Kumar Murala
Physical AI Engineer
Hyderabad · India
Now at · Capgemini
SL
Sai Manasa Leburi
Autonomous Systems Engineer
New York · United States
Now at · NTT Data
RD
Rahul Dhamma
Robot Learning Engineer
Hyderabad · India
Now at · Cognizant
Our locations

Come chat with us—on campus or online.

Flagship campus
Hyderabad
2nd Floor, Hitech City Road · Above Domino's · Opp. Cyber Towers, Jai Hind Enclave · Hyderabad, Telangana
Call
+91 8142998866
US desk
+1 256 388 7766
Opening hours
Mon–Sun · 7 AM–9 PM
Online
Global
Live online classes and mentorship, with working-professional learning options. The VLSI course uses simulation-based lab work.
Format
Live online + mentorship
Options
Working-professional
Learning support

Support when you need to catch up.

Freeze your seat for up to 90 days and rejoin the next class at no extra fee. TAs run catch-up sessions every Saturday, and recordings of every live session are available for the lifetime of your account.

FAQs

Questions about prerequisites, tools and completion.

Do I need to know UVM before joining?+
No. UVM is taught in the common core. Before that stage, you need the digital, RTL-reading and computing skills checked in the diagnostic. Preparation is assigned where needed.
Can both fresh graduates and working engineers join?+
Yes. Both follow the same core and practical exit requirements. Working engineers may complete less preparation when they demonstrate the relevant skills.
Can a software engineer move into this course?+
Yes, with the required hardware foundations. Programming experience helps, but you must also demonstrate RTL, timing and waveform reasoning before entering the core.
How is the learning workload structured?+
The program combines live mentor-led classes, guided labs, project work and support sessions. An advisor can explain the current class format before enrollment.
Will I build a UVM environment myself?+
Yes. You build and connect agents, stimulus, monitors and checking components through the guided work. The capstone uses supplied DUT RTL and validated teaching infrastructure while assessing your own planning, checking, scenarios and analysis.
Which protocols are covered practically?+
APB and AXI4-Lite, including stalls, errors, reset and supported register behavior. Full AXI4 bursts, PCIe, DDR and coherent protocols are not claimed as core implementation outcomes.
Do I need an FPGA board or a powerful GPU?+
The core uses simulation and does not require an FPGA board or GPU. Computer requirements and simulator access depend on the qualified cohort setup and will be stated before enrollment.
Which simulator will I use?+
The cohort's simulator and UVM version will be specified once the complete lab flow is qualified. Do not purchase a licence based on this draft; the access arrangement will be explained with the cohort details.
Is the course only theory or interview preparation?+
No. Practical work includes self-checking environments, reusable UVM components, protocol/register verification and an independent capstone. Interview exercises use the technical work you have completed.
Is job placement guaranteed?+
No. The curriculum includes portfolio and technical-interview preparation. Hiring decisions and outcomes depend on employers and individual applications.
What if I fall behind or need to pause?+
You can freeze your seat for up to 90 days and rejoin the next class at no extra fee. Saturday catch-up sessions and recordings of every live session support your learning. Recordings remain available for the lifetime of your account.
Can I study online or on campus?+
RoboEdify offers its Hyderabad campus, live online classes and a working-professional format. Speak to an advisor about the class format that fits your background.
What happens if I do not meet a practical requirement?+
Feedback identifies the missing capability and the work needed for reassessment. Attendance alone does not meet the proposed completion standard. Cohort-specific reassessment arrangements should be confirmed before enrollment.
How can I learn about fees and delivery options?+
Ask for the current cohort details, including preparation requirements, fees, simulator access and learner-support terms, before making an enrollment decision.

Still have a question?

Find your starting point in design verification.
One million AI-native professionals by 2027.

Tell us about your background in digital logic, RTL and programming. We’ll help you understand the preparation you need and the verification skills this course is designed to develop.

Plan your learning

Course
VLSI Design Verification with SystemVerilog & UVM
Preparation
Diagnostic-based preparation before the common core
Level
Specialist
Curriculum
13 modules

Confirm your intake dates, delivery mode, fees, assessment and practical access with RoboEdify before enrolling. Course content describes the learning scope; an enquiry does not reserve a seat.